First flight of the retractable DA50

Any DA50 related topics.

Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray

User avatar
blsewardjr
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:19 pm
First Name: Bernie
Aircraft Type: DA40
Aircraft Registration: N377DS
Airports: KCHO
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 146 times

First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by blsewardjr »

Bernie Seward, IR, AGI
2003 DA40 N377DS
KCHO Charlottesville, VA
User avatar
Tim H
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:44 pm
First Name: Tim
Aircraft Type: DA40
Aircraft Registration: N233MA
Airports: KMGY
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by Tim H »

Any idea what the wingspan is on this? I'm wondering if it will fit in a 40' wide t-hanger.
User avatar
TimS
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:10 am
First Name: Timothy
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N1446C
Airports: 6B6 Stowe MA
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by TimS »

Tim H wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:26 pm Any idea what the wingspan is on this? I'm wondering if it will fit in a 40' wide t-hanger.
I highly doubt it. Diamond likes long high aspect ratio wings.

Tim
User avatar
CFIDave
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 2678
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
First Name: Dave
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N333GX
Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 1473 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by CFIDave »

Tim H wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:26 pm Any idea what the wingspan is on this? I'm wondering if it will fit in a 40' wide t-hanger.
My guess is that the DA50 wingspan is close to that of the DA42 (e.g., 44 feet). If you compare the DA50 to the DA62 (which share the same basic fuselages, interior, etc.), the wing stubs and and retractable gear also seem to be the same size -- they're just missing the engine nacelles of the DA62. The wings are the same (with the exception of Fowler vs. split flaps). The biggest DA50 vs. DA62 wingspan difference is the wingtips (vertical on the DA50 vs. horizontal on the DA62).
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Oxymoron
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2019 7:30 pm
First Name: Ric
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: GCOOL
Airports:
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by Oxymoron »

I’m at LOAN now watching it fly circuits. Performance looks very punchy. Nice sound too:-)
User avatar
gordsh
3 Diamonds Member
3 Diamonds Member
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:40 pm
First Name: Shawn
Aircraft Type: DA40
Aircraft Registration: CCCCC
Airports:
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by gordsh »

I have been tracking this plane since it was announced. Here are the specs I saved (with the previous SafFran Engine) before they were take down from the website

Image
User avatar
CFIDave
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 2678
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
First Name: Dave
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N333GX
Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 1473 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by CFIDave »

That prototype confirms the 44 foot wingspan (same as DA42).

The major difference between the prototype specs above and the latest DA50 is likely to be max airspeed. I would expect more than 200 knots given retractable gear and 300 hp, but that will be dependent on the "critical altitude" of the CD300 engine (i.e., how high its turbo can make full horsepower).
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
User avatar
ememic99
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
First Name: Emir
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
Airports: LDZA LDVA
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by ememic99 »

CFIDave wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:13 pm I would expect more than 200 knots given retractable gear and 300 hp, but that will be dependent on the "critical altitude" of the CD300 engine (i.e., how high its turbo can make full horsepower).
8000 ft according to:
https://www.continentalmotors.aero/uplo ... cSheet.pdf
User avatar
CFIDave
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 2678
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
First Name: Dave
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N333GX
Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 1473 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by CFIDave »

ememic99 wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2019 4:23 pm
CFIDave wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:13 pm I would expect more than 200 knots given retractable gear and 300 hp, but that will be dependent on the "critical altitude" of the CD300 engine (i.e., how high its turbo can make full horsepower).
8000 ft according to:
https://www.continentalmotors.aero/uplo ... cSheet.pdf
With the CD300 critical altitude that low, there may not be enough horsepower available at the higher altitudes (where there's less atmospheric drag) needed to exceed a 200 knot maximum cruise speed. For example, Cirrus SR22T and Cessna TTx aircraft need to fly in the teens or above in order to exceed 200 knots TAS. Also I incorrectly assumed 300 hp for the CD300, but the specs say only 271 hp.

I guess we'll have to wait and see what Diamond says the DA50 can do.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
User avatar
ememic99
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
First Name: Emir
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
Airports: LDZA LDVA
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: First flight of the retractable DA50

Post by ememic99 »

I’m not sure about HP - on web page it says 296 HP, graph in PDF (2nd page) starts at that value but 1st page says 271 HP. I’m also a bit confused. Also, the graph shows more power than normally aspirated Lycoming engine. If max load is available continuously, I would expect 200 KTAS at FL160 possible.
Post Reply