Approved flight simulators
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- Steven
- 3 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:35 am
- First Name: Steven
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N239DS
- Airports: KLWM
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Approved flight simulators
I understand that the FAA regulations have changed recently to allow IFR approaches in a flight simulator to be logged without a CFI present. But I can't find any clear guidance on which flight simulators can be used for valid loggable approaches. Specifically, I'm trying to figure out if there are affordable home-based flight sims that could be used for the job. Anyone know?
- shorton
- 2 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:42 pm
- First Name: Scott
- Aircraft Type: DA42NG
- Aircraft Registration: N68MJ
- Airports: KSNA
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Approved flight simulators
It has to be at least an aviation training device, which is defined in 61.1 as a training device which is approved by the (FAA) Administrator. So, not Microsoft flight simulator or X plane running on your home computer, but I think there are some devices in the $5-10k range. I think Redbird makes one. The manufacturer needs to have a letter of approval from the FAA and you need to have a copy if you buy the ATD.
Scott Horton, JD CPA
ATP, FAA Gold Seal CFI, CFII, MEI
https://orangecountyflightinstruction.com
KSNA, Orange County, CA
ATP, FAA Gold Seal CFI, CFII, MEI
https://orangecountyflightinstruction.com
KSNA, Orange County, CA
- Rich
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:40 pm
- First Name: Rich
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N40XE
- Airports: S39 Prineville OR
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1180 times
Re: Approved flight simulators
I used to be a partner in a Redbird FMX. Good for practicing IFR work and approved for self-currency activities. Using such a simulator offers more flexible opportunities for practice than being limited by circumstances in your own local area - circumstances such as what approaches are available, traffic and ATC limitations and last but not least: weather. I did find that the simulator was often NOT accurate in duplicating the actual flight characteristics of the aircraft it is nominally supposed to be simulating. For IFR work this isn't normally terribly important, but it is a caution.
I'm not sure how this would work with their smaller simulators, but keeping nav data updated in the FMX required a maintenance contract with Redbird which in our case was based on hours of use. They would connect in to it for this and other software updates.
BTW, at the heart of Redbird simulators is a PC running Windows
I'm not sure how this would work with their smaller simulators, but keeping nav data updated in the FMX required a maintenance contract with Redbird which in our case was based on hours of use. They would connect in to it for this and other software updates.
BTW, at the heart of Redbird simulators is a PC running Windows
2002 DA40-180: MT, PowerFlow, 530W/430W, KAP140, ext. baggage, 1090 ES out, 2646 MTOW, 40gal., Surefly, Flightstream 210, Orion 600 LED, XeVision, Aspen E5
- Steven
- 3 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:35 am
- First Name: Steven
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N239DS
- Airports: KLWM
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Approved flight simulators
A quick look at the Redbird website shows the Jay and TD models as possibly being practical as home-based flight simulators. Though they aren't explicit about it, it seems like the Jay is not an FAA aviation training device but the TD is. At $6995 it's quite an investment though.