New Cirrus Trainer
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- AndrewM
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 2:05 pm
- First Name: Andrew
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N897KC
- Airports:
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Out of interest, if you get your Commercial ticket in the US, does it have any meaningful impact on insurance rates?
Certainly having the Instrument Rating does...
Certainly having the Instrument Rating does...
- Colin
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:37 pm
- First Name: Colin
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N972RD
- Airports: KFHR
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 527 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
My agent said that it would not have an impact on my rates, other than the usual "good student" discount that I get for doing training every year toward endorsements or ratings.
Colin Summers, PP Multi-Engine IFR, ~3,000hrs
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 1473 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Need to distinguish between FAA Commercial single (ASEL) vs. FAA Commercial multi (AMEL).
The single-engine Commercial IMHO is worth getting because of the "stick and rudder" skills it teaches to fly the maneuvers -- it's also a lot of fun! In particular mastering the "180 degree power-off spot landing" really instills confidence that you can put the plane down into a field in the event of an engine failure. Before the FAA change allowed a TAA to substitute for a "complex" single (with real retractable landing gear), I practiced all of the ASEL maneuvers in both my DA40 and a rental A36 Bonanza; for the checkride I demonstrated all of the maneuvers in the DA40 but landed and took the A36 around the pattern a few times just to demonstrate I could work retractable gear.
The twin-engine Commercial (FAA AMEL) is virtually identical to the Private AMEL, but with slightly higher demonstrated performance criteria -- there's so little difference for Private vs. Commercial that most pilots I know migrating from a single to a twin take the Commercial checkride. For flying multi-engine aircraft, I don't think having a Commercial has much of an effect on insurance rates.
I fail to see how the Cirrus Trainer simulated landing gear feature does much good: For the ASEL Commercial you no longer need retractable gear with a TAA -- for which any modern glass cockpit SR20 or SR22 already qualifies. For the AMEL you of course need to fly a twin-engined aircraft, virtually all of which have real retractable gear, and (as already noted) will give the pilot the real sensations of flying gear up vs. down -- something missing with a fake gear switch and lights.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- Colin
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:37 pm
- First Name: Colin
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N972RD
- Airports: KFHR
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 527 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
That was the best dexcription of the commercial ticket differences that I have seen and now it makes sense why it SEEMED like it was going to be so much work when I was headed in single engine and why the DPE I bumped into after my multi rating said, "It will be a piece of cake, it's a big PPL VFR ride for you."
You should *really* get the single add-on because then you can fly seaplanes for hire, which seems like a pretty good job market, particularly in the summers.
You should *really* get the single add-on because then you can fly seaplanes for hire, which seems like a pretty good job market, particularly in the summers.
Colin Summers, PP Multi-Engine IFR, ~3,000hrs
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
In EASA-land it’s big complication - PPL and CPL are two separated worlds and there’s no path for upgrading PPL to CPL. You have to sit 12-13 exams for CPL regardless the fact that content overlaps with PPL at least 70%. And if you have IR on top of PPL you practically covered more than it’s in CPL syllabus. At the same time CPL doesn’t give you IR ticket you have to do it separately (7 exams plus 35 flight hours - the same as when you add IR on top of PPL).
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 1473 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Except that to fly seaplanes in the US requires an "Airplane Single Engine Seaplane" (ASES) or "Airplane Multi Engine Seaplane" (AMES) rating (Private or Commercial) instead of the Aircraft Single Engine Land (ASEL) or Aircraft Multi Engine Land (AMEL) ratings you have now.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- Colin
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:37 pm
- First Name: Colin
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N972RD
- Airports: KFHR
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 527 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Getting the seaplane rating is the fun part. (Kenmore Air in Seattle does training. My guess is they keep track of the good students.)
Colin Summers, PP Multi-Engine IFR, ~3,000hrs
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
- Rich
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:40 pm
- First Name: Rich
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N40XE
- Airports: S39 Prineville OR
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1180 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
At some level, any plane used for training acts as an imperfect simulator for other aircraft of different types you may come to fly. I think that "flow" argument is pretty weak. How about aircraft with cowl flaps and various other requirements, like carb heat whenever power is reduced or the nuances of fuel-tank switching. As far as retractable gear goes, emergency gear extension procedures vary widely among different types. Then there are stall-spin behaviors. I've encountered pilots who were taught to never touch the mixture control at all. So if you train with and are ingrained with the simplicity of FADEC and get that part 135 job flying Beavers around Puget Sound, how much of that "flow" must you unlearn/modify/expand, anyway.
Pilots with thousands of hours in a given accident airplane type inadvertently land with the gear in the wrong position with great regularity. And "gear down" isn't always the proper position, such as with amphibious floats in a water landing. We have numerous accidents (very often fatal) in the Northwest every single year due to this latter oversight, usually due to some untimely distraction.
Pilots with thousands of hours in a given accident airplane type inadvertently land with the gear in the wrong position with great regularity. And "gear down" isn't always the proper position, such as with amphibious floats in a water landing. We have numerous accidents (very often fatal) in the Northwest every single year due to this latter oversight, usually due to some untimely distraction.
2002 DA40-180: MT, PowerFlow, 530W/430W, KAP140, ext. baggage, 1090 ES out, 2646 MTOW, 40gal., Surefly, Flightstream 210, Orion 600 LED, XeVision, Aspen E5
- Moonshine
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:14 pm
- First Name: Max
- Aircraft Type: DA40F
- Aircraft Registration: N727FP
- Airports: KPWK
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Yeah they can. Complex airplane is no longer required for the commercial ticket.
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: New Cirrus Trainer
Once again: As I wrote above - surprisingly, there's aviation outside US - so, what's possible under FAA regulation might not be in EASA-land or in some countries in Europe.