Garmin refuses to service GIA63W LRUs
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- Sandy
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:30 pm
- First Name: Sanford
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N159PS
- Airports: KPDK
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Garmin refuses to service GIA63W LRUs
I have been on the “lookout” for a pair of GIA63W LRUs for some time. I finally located, and purchased, a pair. I took them to a Garmin dealer and asked that they be sent to Garmin to be overhauled and recertified, as required, for which I was willing to pay, of course. Garmin flat out refused to take them in for overhaul.
Sandy
Sandy
- TwinStarScott
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 3:13 am
- First Name: Scott
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N189Y
- Airports: WN53
- Has thanked: 884 times
- Been thanked: 224 times
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 233 times
- Been thanked: 1479 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
Garmin's standard practice is to swap G1000 Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) only if yours needs repair: They will overnight ship you one of their spare LRUs that likely came out of someone else's aircraft, and then they expect to receive your removed LRU shipped back to them for repair -- so they can give that unit after repair to someone else.
I'm not sure that Garmin does "overhaul and recertification" of any G1000 LRUs, including GIA63Ws.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- Boatguy
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:48 am
- First Name: Russ
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N962M
- Airports: KSTS
- Has thanked: 1355 times
- Been thanked: 1189 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
Given the need for the GIA63Ws in legacy aircraft, and Garmin's inability to provide them, it seems like a reasonable request for which Sandy was willing to pay a fair price. Certainly Garmin must put repaired units through a QA process before shipping them out as an exchange for the next customer who needs a repair; I think that is the service Sandy was requesting.
But apparently Garmin prefers that a pair of GIA63Ws which could be making Sandy's airplane more IFR airworthy be dumped into a recycling bin or landfill. This makes no sense, makes nobody happy and doesn't even lead to the purchase of some other product by which Garmin could profit.
The lifecycle of a Garmin product is 10-15yrs. If you own a Diamond with G1000, the clock is ticking. We will all be Sandy at some point in time as Garmin abandons the products which are baked into the certification of our airplanes.
But apparently Garmin prefers that a pair of GIA63Ws which could be making Sandy's airplane more IFR airworthy be dumped into a recycling bin or landfill. This makes no sense, makes nobody happy and doesn't even lead to the purchase of some other product by which Garmin could profit.
The lifecycle of a Garmin product is 10-15yrs. If you own a Diamond with G1000, the clock is ticking. We will all be Sandy at some point in time as Garmin abandons the products which are baked into the certification of our airplanes.
- pietromarx
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:52 am
- First Name: Peter
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: NZZZ
- Airports: KWHP
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
Hi Sandy - could you provide a little more background on this (alarming) piece of information? Did Garmin give you a reason why they wouldn't overhaul your GIA63W's? If I could ask, where did these units from from? Was the issue overhauling (did they need a repair?) or recertifying? Finally, as a newbie, what exactly is re-certifying?Sandy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:31 am I have been on the “lookout” for a pair of GIA63W LRUs for some time. I finally located, and purchased, a pair. I took them to a Garmin dealer and asked that they be sent to Garmin to be overhauled and recertified, as required, for which I was willing to pay, of course. Garmin flat out refused to take them in for overhaul.
Sandy
Thanks much
Peter
-
- 3 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 2:04 am
- First Name: Tim
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: CGMTS
- Airports:
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
Does't sound right. I did exactly that and had mine done April 2019 for $1300 each.Sandy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:31 am I have been on the “lookout” for a pair of GIA63W LRUs for some time. I finally located, and purchased, a pair. I took them to a Garmin dealer and asked that they be sent to Garmin to be overhauled and recertified, as required, for which I was willing to pay, of course. Garmin flat out refused to take them in for overhaul.
Sandy
- Sandy
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:30 pm
- First Name: Sanford
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N159PS
- Airports: KPDK
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
Hi Sandy - could you provide a little more background on this (alarming) piece of information? Did Garmin give you a reason why they wouldn't overhaul your GIA63W's? If I could ask, where did these units from from? Was the issue overhauling (did they need a repair?) or recertifying? Finally, as a newbie, what exactly is re-certifying?
Thanks much
Peter
While I do not wish to fully identify either the party from whom I purchased the LRUs, the Garmin dealer involved, or the Garmin "field engineer" who advised both the dealer and me that Garmin would not touch the units, I can add the following information.Does't sound right. I did exactly that and had mine done April 2019 for $1300 each.
I have been flying for almost 50 years, and I have owned a number of planes, including my current non-WAAS 2005 DA40. I practice Aviation Law, and I have attended all of the major airshows (Airventure, Sun N Fun, etc.), flown Angel Flights, Hurricane relief, and Young Eagles for a long time, whereby I know many, many people in the aviation community. Unlike other attorneys, I do not give out business cards, but, instead, give out very nice metal pens that have a stylus at one end of their caps, and an LED light surrounding the tip, whereby they are ideal for use with your iPad as well as for taking clearances, etc. at night. If you're Involved in aviation, and I've ever met you, you have one. In short, when I said that I have been looking for a pair of GIA63Ws for my plane, I assure you that my "tentacles" have been "out there", whereby I was quite pleased to have been able to purchase a pair from a reputable supplier of "previously owned" aviation equipment.
Having purchased the two GIA63Ws, my next step was to take them to a reputable Garmin dealer, who was quite willing to install them in my plane. Prior to having them installed, however, I requested that they be sent to Garmin to be checked and repaired, as needed if any repairs were needed. I was quoted a price of about $2,500 for both based on Garmin's "flat rate" repair policy. I did not request, nor require, a one-day turnaround, and I was quite willing to pay the charge, even if the units worked perfectly when received by Garmin. Note, that neither I, nor the Garmin dealer, nor Garmin have any reason to believe that the units were not 100% operational. Nevertheless, I was dumbfounded to learn from my dealer that when he sought an RMA number to send the units to Garmin for such service, if any, that may have been required, he was told by a Garmin "field engineer" that it was Garmin's "policy" to not perform service, nor replace, the LRUs unless they came out of my own plane. As I could not believe that Garmin wanted to have me trash the units, that Garmin would not even accept them back for testing, and that Garmin was firm on that "policy", I requested, and obtained the name of the Garmin field engineer. I then spoke directly with him, and he confirmed that Garmin would not touch the units, as they did not know (nor did I) their entire history, although I was told that Garmin had sold them, as new, to an aircraft company other than Diamond. Nevertheless, these units had the appropriate Model Nos. for installation in my plane.
As one who has held an Instrument rating for 35 years, I have flown my share of ADF and VOR non-precision approaches, and despite having had an autopilot in my planes for at least 40 years, I only recall having flown one coupled approach, and that was just to see how the plane flew it, so I am comfortable with LNAV approaches, although I would prefer to have the WAAS capability.
Basically, aside from the names that I have omitted, that is the story.
Sandy
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 205 times
- Been thanked: 393 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
That's really odd story but it reflects today's situation and bad sides of monopoly position. Being pilot myself for 35+ years I can only confirm that such things didn't happen in the past. Since a meeting will be held in near future between DAI, Garmin and few participants of this forum, this issue can be raised under the topic of legacy G1000 hardware upgrade/repair.
- Colin
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:37 pm
- First Name: Colin
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N972RD
- Airports: KFHR
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 527 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
If the company cannot confirm the chain of possession, they are picking up an unknown liability. Sounds like lawyers got to the engineers.
Can you put them in your plane, fly for two years, and then send them in for "repair?"
Can you put them in your plane, fly for two years, and then send them in for "repair?"
Colin Summers, PP Multi-Engine IFR, ~3,000hrs
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
- Sandy
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:30 pm
- First Name: Sanford
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N159PS
- Airports: KPDK
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: The G1000 project - "The next step"
I would be very interested in, possibly, attending such a meeting.That's really odd story but it reflects today's situation and bad sides of monopoly position. Being pilot myself for 35+ years I can only confirm that such things didn't happen in the past. Since a meeting will be held in near future between DAI, Garmin and few participants of this forum, this issue can be raised under the topic of legacy G1000 hardware upgrade/repair.
Sandy