Not something I can recall running into. Usually a higher LPV than 200 ft. is because of lack of the approach light infrastructure. Around here that shortcoming seems to be worth about 50 ft. (i.e., 250 ft AGL instead of 200 ft.)ultraturtle wrote:Most places I fly, the ILS gets you lower minimums than the RNAV LPV to the same runway... but not always (KFFC LPV to RWY 31 gets you a whole foot lower than the ILS to RWY 31).
Conversely, most of the places I fly to that have an LPV (and various other WAAS approaches) lack an ILS altogether. The only airport within 100 nm I can find with an ILS and LPV to the same runway where the DA for the LPV DA > ILS is Klamath Falls.