Has anyone observed an incorrect engine load % reading at higher altitudes for the DA42-VI? I experienced this several times on a long cross country at or above FL150. Specifically the L/R load indicated, as well as the fuel in GPH, were asymmetrical (e.g. Left 87% and 8.0 GPH ; Right 79% and 7.1 GPH) yet was RPM was symmetric at 2040. In all cases, pulling the throttles back and then moving to 75% rectifyed the discrepancies.
Thanks in advance for your input.
Engine Load indication incorrect at higher altitudes
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- ultraturtle
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 2:46 pm
- First Name: Rob
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N62KZ
- Airports: KAAF
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 183 times
Re: Engine Load indication incorrect at higher altitudes
I observe an opposite load % discrepancy in my -VI at altitude. I have air conditioning installed, and the book (Ops Supplement S07, 5.3.10) states "The Cruise Speed with the Recirculating Air - Cabin Cooling System switched OFF is reduced by 2 %." I interpret this to mean that there is always less motive power available from the left engine at any given RPM. I have always had the left engine load lag, with the RPM similar to the right at the same throttle position while climbing through the mid teens, and assumed it was due to the idle drag of the additional alternator on the left engine (the air conditioning having been turned off long before).
Oddly, and much like you, I have been able to largely rectify the difference by pulling power to well below 75%, then restoring it, but the left load % has never fully caught up with the right load % at the same RPM at altitudes in the mid teens and above when advancing both throttles to achieve anything much above 75%.
Oddly, and much like you, I have been able to largely rectify the difference by pulling power to well below 75%, then restoring it, but the left load % has never fully caught up with the right load % at the same RPM at altitudes in the mid teens and above when advancing both throttles to achieve anything much above 75%.
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 233 times
- Been thanked: 1480 times
Re: Engine Load indication incorrect at higher altitudes
The differences you see in L vs. R engine loads (and fuel consumption) at the same RPM are likely due to variation in prop governor operation between engines; sometimes one engine governor will lag behind the other as power is increased. As noted, this can sometimes be fixed by temporarily throttling back and then increasing power back to 75% or whatever your desired cruise loading is. In my experience this can happen at lower as well as higher altitudes.
I doubt the RACC (especially when turned OFF) has anything to do with the difference. The exception is when sitting on the ground at idle with air conditioning ON you can see 2% more load needed on the left engine to maintain idle RPM.
I doubt the RACC (especially when turned OFF) has anything to do with the difference. The exception is when sitting on the ground at idle with air conditioning ON you can see 2% more load needed on the left engine to maintain idle RPM.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- ultraturtle
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 2:46 pm
- First Name: Rob
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N62KZ
- Airports: KAAF
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 183 times
Re: Engine Load indication incorrect at higher altitudes
At FL180 I've seen as much as 8% less load on the left than the right at firewall power, RPMs roughly matched, even after throttling back then restoring full throttle.
At 75%, however, they are evenly matched. That's my preferred cruise power, so I'm not too concerned. For me, it's only an issue in the climb.
At 75%, however, they are evenly matched. That's my preferred cruise power, so I'm not too concerned. For me, it's only an issue in the climb.
- baldesk
- 2 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:26 am
- First Name: Kevin
- Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
- Aircraft Registration: N521QA
- Airports: KBLM
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Engine Load indication incorrect at higher altitudes
Thanks all. Happy to hear there is no major concern and that others are seeing the same behavior.
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 205 times
- Been thanked: 393 times