Page 1 of 3

Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 6:51 pm
by Boatguy
Another certified diesel. Similar power to Austro but 3.3l displacement, a little lighter, flat 4 so probably a little more compact.

https://www.deltahawk.com/engines/

https://www.diamondaircraft.com/en/aust ... /overview/

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 8:09 pm
by RookieFlyer
Inverted V

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 9:27 pm
by Boatguy
Good catch. Direct drive means no gearbox for less weight, less maintenance, less cost and greater reliability.

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 11:26 pm
by chili4way
Nice to see a third compression ignition engine. And so many thoughts & questions:
  • lower RPM likely bigger diesel torque pulses and implications for propeller compatibility
  • dirty diesel engine oil and the constant speed governor & propeller
  • unclear about how "no complicated FADEC" engine control works (and where they draw the line between complicated and simple)
  • is it a fully mechanical control system, i.e., will it continue to run when all the batteries in the plane are dead?
  • "turbocharged and supercharged" aka "twin charging": see Road & Track Article; sounds nifty, especially at lower RPMs, but does this qualify as "simple"?
  • probably even fewer engine service facilities compared to Austro and Continental diesel engines
  • how many scheduled service parts are industry standard, and how many are proprietary? what's the initial & expected service schedule?
  • has anyone taken a prototype engine to a shooting range to determine if it's bulletproof?
Wonder who the introductory airframe manufacturer will be (and if it will be GA)?

Looking forward to further developments.

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Sat May 27, 2023 12:49 am
by Colin
They sure have been working on that for a long time. Does anyone know the timeline of the Austro?

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Sat May 27, 2023 2:56 am
by chili4way
The question is where and when you place the starting line. Mercedes? Thielert? Or just Austro?

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 7:15 pm
by CFIDave
Critical altitude is over 17,000 feet, rather than only around 12,000 feet for Austros (and even lower for Continental TDI engines). So a great engine for maintaining full power up high and getting over more weather.

I'd expect to see this show up in a Cirrus SR20. Would probably provide more power than the normally-aspirated Lycoming IO-390 above 5000 feet.

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 7:43 pm
by CFIDave
Colin wrote: Sat May 27, 2023 12:49 am They sure have been working on that for a long time. Does anyone know the timeline of the Austro?
Austro engine development was -- by necessity -- a "rush job."

By 2007 Diamond could see that the company Thielert supplying engines for DA42 TDIs (and European DA40Ds) was having financial problems, as well as experiencing serious maintenance issues on its engines.

So the Dries family (Diamond owners at the time) quietly started Austro Engine in that timeframe, developing the AE300 based on an existing Mercedes OM640 diesel car engine then used in European A-class and B-class autos. Austro mostly just swapped out engine accessories while leaving the core engines unchanged. That dramatically cut engine development and certification time.

Thielert went bankrupt in mid-2008, causing Diamond to temporarily produce aircraft with no available engines. Fortunately because Diamond had already been "secretly" working on Austro engine development, they were able to certify the AE300 engine soon afterwards in 2009, introduced in the DA42NG model certified that same year.

So it probably took Diamond/Austro less than 3 years (and about $50M in Dries family money) from start to finish for certification of the AE300.

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 8:08 pm
by RookieFlyer
If the Delta Hawk engine becomes popular, I could see Diamond adopting it and shifting away from their Austro's.

Re: Delta Hawk DHK180

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 12:29 am
by neema
I got very, very excited about this engine again but the G1000 hurdle, of all things, is likely the biggest obstacle.

Diamond is its own engine manufacturer. If they make money on selling engines and engine parts, my guess is there is no incentive for them to give business to their competitor. They hold the power exclusively to ask (and pay) Garmin for a software rewrite to accommodate different engines.

On paper, this engine is far and away better than the Austro.

~90 lbs lighter (each), almost no electrical equipment to fail, less proprietary equipment needed, field serviceable.

It'll integrate on 42s and 62s easily in many ways. Things like our coolant based heater/defrost can stay.

Practically, it'll burn slightly more fuel, but negligible. Unknowns are high altitude, low-power requirements (to prevent flameout) and cold soaked restarts.

Imagine a 200 hp DA62 with counter rotating engines and 180 lb lower empty weight. Sure, we'll have blue knobs again but I wouldn't mind that at all. I could do something to sync the props. Better yet, traditional prop governors could use a type 2 synchrophaser that keeps them in sync all the time