Above FL180
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- nickname
- 3 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 6:19 am
- First Name: Noah
- Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
- Aircraft Registration: N112NG
- Airports: KPDX
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Above FL180
Had some flights recently between 160-180. ATC gave a block between 170-190 and I didn't go above 180 due to mask and operating limitations. But, it had me wondering, anyone that has PIREPs or data points on operating higher? On my DA40 the altitude pre-select didn't allow for above 165 but on the DA42 it allows above 180.
CFI-I ASEL/AMEL
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 424 times
Re: Above FL180
Obviously performance reduces but not dramatically and I believe that -VI still operates fine, having in mind that DA62 (with practically same engines) is certified to FL200. I’ve flown DA42TDI (CD-155) few times above FL180 due to icing conditions below and while it’s not optimal, it’s still ok. I have data somewhere and I’ll share it once I find it.
- Boatguy
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:48 am
- First Name: Russ
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N962M
- Airports: KSTS
- Has thanked: 1550 times
- Been thanked: 1338 times
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 424 times
Re: Above FL180
Measured saturation was fine and subjective feeling was ok still using cannula although I had mask prepared.
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 424 times
Re: Above FL180
Here are average data.
FL200:
- 75% 127 KIAS, 177 KTAS, 2300 RPM, 13.2 GPH
- 70% 125 KIAS, 174 KTAS, 2170 RPM, 12.2 GPH
FL190:
- 77% 130 KIAS, 176 KTAS, 2300 RPM, 13.8 GPH
- 75% 130 KIAS, 176 KTAS, 2270 RPM, 13.6 GPH
- 70% 126 KIAS, 172 KTAS, 2130 RPM, 12.2 GPH
FL200:
- 75% 127 KIAS, 177 KTAS, 2300 RPM, 13.2 GPH
- 70% 125 KIAS, 174 KTAS, 2170 RPM, 12.2 GPH
FL190:
- 77% 130 KIAS, 176 KTAS, 2300 RPM, 13.8 GPH
- 75% 130 KIAS, 176 KTAS, 2270 RPM, 13.6 GPH
- 70% 126 KIAS, 172 KTAS, 2130 RPM, 12.2 GPH
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 251 times
- Been thanked: 1529 times
Re: Above FL180
When I visited the Austrian factory years ago to pick up my new DA42-VI and ferry it across the Atlantic, the Diamond pilot who accompanied me on the trip said that the factory had flown a DA42-VI above 30,000 feet. I'm certainly not recommending that, but it demonstrates that Austro engines should have no problem operating in the low 20s, if needed for example to top bad weather.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- meowmeow
- 2 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:47 pm
- First Name: Sven
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N16ES
- Airports: KBFI
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Above FL180
Interesting experiences and numbers to know!
(That said, aren't aircraft operating limitations mentioned in the AFM (mine: 2.11 The maximum operating alt is 18,000 ft) regulatory - so one may actually not go into class A with a Twin Star - or am I missing something..?
(That said, aren't aircraft operating limitations mentioned in the AFM (mine: 2.11 The maximum operating alt is 18,000 ft) regulatory - so one may actually not go into class A with a Twin Star - or am I missing something..?
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 424 times
Re: Above FL180
If you have to go above weather and you know FL200 makes difference, you just ask and climb. ATC will always accommodate such request traffic allowing.meowmeow wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 4:55 pm Interesting experiences and numbers to know!
(That said, aren't aircraft operating limitations mentioned in the AFM (mine: 2.11 The maximum operating alt is 18,000 ft) regulatory - so one may actually not go into class A with a Twin Star - or am I missing something..?
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 251 times
- Been thanked: 1529 times
Re: Above FL180
You are correct that the maximum operating altitude is regulatory, so legally it should not be exceeded. When certifying the DA42-VI, Diamond chose to limit the plane's operation to altitudes of 18,000 feet and below -- not necessarily because the plane couldn't be safely flown above 18K, but for liability, business, competitive or other reasons.meowmeow wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 4:55 pm Interesting experiences and numbers to know!
(That said, aren't aircraft operating limitations mentioned in the AFM (mine: 2.11 The maximum operating alt is 18,000 ft) regulatory - so one may actually not go into class A with a Twin Star - or am I missing something..?
In reality nobody enforces this limit if you exceed it. I've had multiple occasions when flying our Epic E1000 (with a maximum certified operating alt of FL340) when ATC has asked if we could accept FL350 to help resolve potential traffic conflicts. We've always declined to fly that high, one reason being that at RVSM altitudes above 28,000 feet you legally MUST fly on autopilot due to the tremendous closing speeds (e.g., more than 700-800 knots) with other traffic passing only 1000 feet above or below you. I'm not sure our GFC700 autopilot will permit climbing above FL340. We'd also likely experience cabin pressures above 10,000 feet if we flew above FL340.
You have a different set of considerations with the DA42-VI. The similar DA62 (with which the DA42 used to share its type certificate) is certified to 20,000 feet, and you don't have to worry about cabin pressurization. But you are supposed to use a mask instead of a cannula when above 18,000 feet, which is far less comfortable and requires use of a different microphone. I know multiple Cirrus SR22T (certified to 25,000 feet) pilots who won't fly above 18,000 feet for this reason.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- ememic99
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
- First Name: Emir
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
- Airports: LDZA LDVA
- Has thanked: 210 times
- Been thanked: 424 times
Re: Above FL180
Being supposed and really needing a mask are two different things I tested this on several occasions with oxymeter and didn’t notice any difference between FL180 and FL200.CFIDave wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 6:00 pmBut you are supposed to use a mask instead of a cannula when above 18,000 feet, which is far less comfortable and requires use of a different microphone. I know multiple Cirrus SR22T (certified to 25,000 feet) pilots who won't fly above 18,000 feet for this reason.meowmeow wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 4:55 pm Interesting experiences and numbers to know!
(That said, aren't aircraft operating limitations mentioned in the AFM (mine: 2.11 The maximum operating alt is 18,000 ft) regulatory - so one may actually not go into class A with a Twin Star - or am I missing something..?