Delta Hawk DHK180
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- Boatguy
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:48 am
- First Name: Russ
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N962M
- Airports: KSTS
- Has thanked: 1366 times
- Been thanked: 1196 times
Delta Hawk DHK180
Another certified diesel. Similar power to Austro but 3.3l displacement, a little lighter, flat 4 so probably a little more compact.
https://www.deltahawk.com/engines/
https://www.diamondaircraft.com/en/aust ... /overview/
https://www.deltahawk.com/engines/
https://www.diamondaircraft.com/en/aust ... /overview/
- RookieFlyer
- 2 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 7:42 am
- First Name: Ken
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: NIL
- Airports: NZAR
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
- Boatguy
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:48 am
- First Name: Russ
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N962M
- Airports: KSTS
- Has thanked: 1366 times
- Been thanked: 1196 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
Good catch. Direct drive means no gearbox for less weight, less maintenance, less cost and greater reliability.
- chili4way
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:51 pm
- First Name: Paul
- Aircraft Type: DA40NG
- Aircraft Registration: N718NG
- Airports: KADS
- Has thanked: 1063 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
Nice to see a third compression ignition engine. And so many thoughts & questions:
Looking forward to further developments.
- lower RPM likely bigger diesel torque pulses and implications for propeller compatibility
- dirty diesel engine oil and the constant speed governor & propeller
- unclear about how "no complicated FADEC" engine control works (and where they draw the line between complicated and simple)
- is it a fully mechanical control system, i.e., will it continue to run when all the batteries in the plane are dead?
- "turbocharged and supercharged" aka "twin charging": see Road & Track Article; sounds nifty, especially at lower RPMs, but does this qualify as "simple"?
- probably even fewer engine service facilities compared to Austro and Continental diesel engines
- how many scheduled service parts are industry standard, and how many are proprietary? what's the initial & expected service schedule?
- has anyone taken a prototype engine to a shooting range to determine if it's bulletproof?
Looking forward to further developments.
- Colin
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:37 pm
- First Name: Colin
- Aircraft Type: DA42
- Aircraft Registration: N972RD
- Airports: KFHR
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 527 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
They sure have been working on that for a long time. Does anyone know the timeline of the Austro?
Colin Summers, PP Multi-Engine IFR, ~3,000hrs
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
colin@mightycheese.com * send email rather than PM
http://www.flyingsummers.com
N972RD DA42 G1000 2.0 s/n 42.AC100 (sold!)
N971RD DA40 G1000 s/n 40.508 (traded)
- chili4way
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:51 pm
- First Name: Paul
- Aircraft Type: DA40NG
- Aircraft Registration: N718NG
- Airports: KADS
- Has thanked: 1063 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
The question is where and when you place the starting line. Mercedes? Thielert? Or just Austro?
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 1480 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
Critical altitude is over 17,000 feet, rather than only around 12,000 feet for Austros (and even lower for Continental TDI engines). So a great engine for maintaining full power up high and getting over more weather.
I'd expect to see this show up in a Cirrus SR20. Would probably provide more power than the normally-aspirated Lycoming IO-390 above 5000 feet.
I'd expect to see this show up in a Cirrus SR20. Would probably provide more power than the normally-aspirated Lycoming IO-390 above 5000 feet.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 1480 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
Austro engine development was -- by necessity -- a "rush job."
By 2007 Diamond could see that the company Thielert supplying engines for DA42 TDIs (and European DA40Ds) was having financial problems, as well as experiencing serious maintenance issues on its engines.
So the Dries family (Diamond owners at the time) quietly started Austro Engine in that timeframe, developing the AE300 based on an existing Mercedes OM640 diesel car engine then used in European A-class and B-class autos. Austro mostly just swapped out engine accessories while leaving the core engines unchanged. That dramatically cut engine development and certification time.
Thielert went bankrupt in mid-2008, causing Diamond to temporarily produce aircraft with no available engines. Fortunately because Diamond had already been "secretly" working on Austro engine development, they were able to certify the AE300 engine soon afterwards in 2009, introduced in the DA42NG model certified that same year.
So it probably took Diamond/Austro less than 3 years (and about $50M in Dries family money) from start to finish for certification of the AE300.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
- RookieFlyer
- 2 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 7:42 am
- First Name: Ken
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: NIL
- Airports: NZAR
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
If the Delta Hawk engine becomes popular, I could see Diamond adopting it and shifting away from their Austro's.
- neema
- 4 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 5:43 am
- First Name: Neema
- Aircraft Type: DA62
- Aircraft Registration: N617DC
- Airports: KFAT
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: Delta Hawk DHK180
I got very, very excited about this engine again but the G1000 hurdle, of all things, is likely the biggest obstacle.
Diamond is its own engine manufacturer. If they make money on selling engines and engine parts, my guess is there is no incentive for them to give business to their competitor. They hold the power exclusively to ask (and pay) Garmin for a software rewrite to accommodate different engines.
On paper, this engine is far and away better than the Austro.
~90 lbs lighter (each), almost no electrical equipment to fail, less proprietary equipment needed, field serviceable.
It'll integrate on 42s and 62s easily in many ways. Things like our coolant based heater/defrost can stay.
Practically, it'll burn slightly more fuel, but negligible. Unknowns are high altitude, low-power requirements (to prevent flameout) and cold soaked restarts.
Imagine a 200 hp DA62 with counter rotating engines and 180 lb lower empty weight. Sure, we'll have blue knobs again but I wouldn't mind that at all. I could do something to sync the props. Better yet, traditional prop governors could use a type 2 synchrophaser that keeps them in sync all the time
Diamond is its own engine manufacturer. If they make money on selling engines and engine parts, my guess is there is no incentive for them to give business to their competitor. They hold the power exclusively to ask (and pay) Garmin for a software rewrite to accommodate different engines.
On paper, this engine is far and away better than the Austro.
~90 lbs lighter (each), almost no electrical equipment to fail, less proprietary equipment needed, field serviceable.
It'll integrate on 42s and 62s easily in many ways. Things like our coolant based heater/defrost can stay.
Practically, it'll burn slightly more fuel, but negligible. Unknowns are high altitude, low-power requirements (to prevent flameout) and cold soaked restarts.
Imagine a 200 hp DA62 with counter rotating engines and 180 lb lower empty weight. Sure, we'll have blue knobs again but I wouldn't mind that at all. I could do something to sync the props. Better yet, traditional prop governors could use a type 2 synchrophaser that keeps them in sync all the time