Prop Damage

Any DA62 related topics

Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray

User avatar
Zebedee
3 Diamonds Member
3 Diamonds Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 8:14 pm
First Name: Jim
Aircraft Type: DA62
Aircraft Registration: N316JZ
Airports: KPOV KPGD
Been thanked: 20 times

Prop Damage

Post by Zebedee »

I have dings in both of my prop leading edges. More than I feel I should. Maybe I'm just unlucky or my home airport has more than its fair share of loose stones. (true)

Or maybe the MT wooden prop with its nickel leading edge is not as tough as Hartzell

I can't help but wonder if the ECU test and static run up at takeoff to check for max power are also not contributing factors.

Surely applying power slowly and confirming full power by 60kts is the same thing. Maybe the turbos kicking in is the reason, but you get the same thing on touch n go's and its vey manageable.

Does everyone runup power to max before brake release?

I not, what do you do?

Thanks

JIm
User avatar
ememic99
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
First Name: Emir
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
Airports: LDZA LDVA
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 393 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by ememic99 »

Zebedee wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:52 pm …static run up at takeoff to check for max power…
Why would you do this on normal takeoff if there’s sufficient runway available for stop in case loss of power / no sufficient power developed during ground run?
Does everyone runup power to max before brake release?
Only for short field takeoff.
User avatar
Soareyes
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:47 pm
First Name: Dan
Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
Aircraft Registration: N518R
Airports: KINF
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 195 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by Soareyes »

Are the leading edges made of nickel or stainless steel? In 2021 I spoke with someone from MT who said all their props had nickel, except for the ones on Austro engines.
Current: DA42-V1

Previous: Hang gliders, Paraglider, DA40(x3), Cessna 150 Aerobat, SR22
User avatar
Zebedee
3 Diamonds Member
3 Diamonds Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 8:14 pm
First Name: Jim
Aircraft Type: DA62
Aircraft Registration: N316JZ
Airports: KPOV KPGD
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by Zebedee »

My DA62 transition instructor taught me to do all takeoffs holding brakes and checking full power prior to brake release.

This video shows that at 4min 20secs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xegFTDgroZg&t=11s

Here at 6.46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctgzb2SDq4Y

Here at 2.18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzPjSasTFJ4&t=22s

AFM under normal takeoff did not show anything about holding brakes.

Of course there are multiple videos without holding the brakes.

The procedure is coming from somewhere, just wondering where.

Thanks

Jim
User avatar
Ed McDonald
3 Diamonds Member
3 Diamonds Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 1:08 am
First Name: Ed
Aircraft Type: DA62NG
Aircraft Registration: CFPWP
Airports: CFB6
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by Ed McDonald »

In addition to avoiding prop damage, a rolling take-off allows the aircraft to have more speed and more air going over the rudder before full power (and torque) is achieved, thus reducing the amount of foot work required on take-off.
User avatar
Chris
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 938
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:34 am
First Name: Chris
Aircraft Type: DA42NG
Aircraft Registration: N449TS
Airports: KHIO
Has thanked: 1066 times
Been thanked: 484 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by Chris »

Zebedee wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:52 pm Does everyone runup power to max before brake release?

If not, what do you do?
I only hold the brakes that long on short(ish) runways. Most of the time I'm operating from runways over 4500' and either perform a rolling start from the taxiway or release the brakes as the power passes 50%. I feel that the MT props are a little more fragile than the Hartzell ones when it comes to damage from picking up loose gravel, though I don't have any way to measure that.

The ECU test doesn't get close to max power, so I'm generally less concerned about those.
Chris
N449TS / DA42-NG / 42.AC049
KHIO
User avatar
ememic99
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:31 am
First Name: Emir
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: SEMAD
Airports: LDZA LDVA
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 393 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by ememic99 »

Zebedee wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:22 pm The procedure is coming from somewhere, just wondering where.
Strange stuff can come from various sources, some can be passed over generations of instructors although they are absolutely wrong. My favorite one is a myth of ice bridging on pneumatic deicing boots. It used to be problem on very first generation of these devices but there are still instructors who teach and pilots who believe this. And there was at least one accident due to late deicing activation due believing this nonsense.
User avatar
michael.g.miller
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:52 am
First Name: Mike
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Airports:
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by michael.g.miller »

Zebedee wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:22 pm My DA62 transition instructor taught me to do all takeoffs holding brakes and checking full power prior to brake release.
As you pointed out, this is certainly not SOP per the AFM. I would only hold the brakes on short runways, since you want to validate proper operation of the engine. Usually ECU failures happen a few seconds after full power, so on a short runway, you want to be sure you have time to pull power back and abort.

Static takeoffs significantly increase wear on the propeller (due to debris), and subject the engine to high power with low cooling. Certainly not an ideal operating environment unless necessary due to runway length.

Does the instructor have significant Diamond time?
User avatar
MikeMeadows
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:44 am
First Name: Mike
Aircraft Type: DA62
Aircraft Registration: N486A
Airports: KTME KDWH KIWS TS07 KSGR
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by MikeMeadows »

Soareyes wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 1:06 pm Are the leading edges made of nickel or stainless steel? In 2021 I spoke with someone from MT who said all their props had nickel, except for the ones on Austro engines.
MT website says "The metal leading edge can be manufactured from stainless steel or optionally chemically from Nickel.” In the DA62 POH, it states on page 7-32 "Each propeller has wood composite blades with fiber-reinforced plastic coating and stainless steel edge cladding. Also, Ewing does state on page 68 of his DA62 iBook “Outer edges protected by stainless steel cladding"

I teach stainless, not nickel.

Mike Meadows
CFII MEI
Houston, TX
User avatar
Zebedee
3 Diamonds Member
3 Diamonds Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 8:14 pm
First Name: Jim
Aircraft Type: DA62
Aircraft Registration: N316JZ
Airports: KPOV KPGD
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Prop Damage

Post by Zebedee »

Thanks for all the insight. Lots of good info here.
Post Reply